Building a community of inquiry for pluralistic practice
Keywords:
Pluralism, Social Justice, Community of Inquiry, Psychotherapy, Counselling, Participatory Research, ResearchAbstract
Pluralism offers a means of recognising the value of multiple voices and perspectives and has emerged as an increasingly significant guiding framework for making sense of the complexity and diversity of contemporary social life. Pluralistic Practice is an open access journal created with the intention of supporting the development of a global community of inquiry within which practitioners, communities, and citizens can share knowledge, experience, and evidence around the challenges and benefits of working pluralistically to facilitate individual and collective well-being, solidarity, and justice. The present article offers an introduction to how the journal will operate and what it hopes to achieve and extends an invitation to be part of this endeavour.
References
Aherne, C., Moloney, O., & O’Brien, G. (2019). Youth mental health and the power threat meaning framework: Jigsaw’s systems perspective. Clinical Psychology Forum, 313, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2019.1.313.3
Al-Roubaiy, N., Owen-Pugh, V. & Wheeler, S (2017). Iraqi refugee men’s experiences of psychotherapy: clinical implications and the proposal of a pluralistic model. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(5), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1370534
Amari, N. (2023). Self-formulation in counselling psychology: The Power Threat Meaning Framework. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 00221678231154292. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231154292
Ambika, G., Kurths, J. Tipping in complex systems: theory, methods and applications. European Physical. Journal Special Topics 230, 3177–3179 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00281-z
Ammentorp, J., Wolderslund, M., Timmermann, C., Larsen, H., Steffensen, K. D., Nielsen, A., ... & Gulbrandsen, P. (2018). How participatory action research changed our view of the challenges of shared decision-making training. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(4), 639-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.002
Ankolekar, A., Dahl Steffensen, K., Olling, K., Dekker, A., Wee, L., Roumen, C., ... & Fijten, R. (2021). Practitioners’ views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study. PLoS One, 16(11), e0259844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259844
Antoniou, P., Cooper, M., Tempier, A. and Holliday, C. (2017). Helpful aspects of pluralistic therapy for depression. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12116
Asfeldt, M., & Beames, S. (2017). Trusting the journey: Embracing the unpredictable and difficult to measure nature of wilderness educational expeditions. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(1), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916676101
Beaumont, P., & de Coning, C. (2022). Coping with Complexity: Toward Epistemological Pluralism in Climate–Conflict Scholarship. International Studies Review, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viac055
Benjamin, A. (2020). The therapy community must commit to anti-racist practice. UKCP. Retrieved from: https://www.psychotherapy.org.uk/news/the-therapy-community-must-commit-to-anti-racist-practice/
Blunden, N. (2020). “And we are a human being”. Coproduced reflections on person‐centred psychotherapy in plural and dissociative identity. Psychotherapy and Politics International, e1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1578
Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2021). Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 980-989. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3
Buchanan, N. T., Perez, M., Prinstein, M. J., & Thurston, I. B. (2021). Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1097–1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000905
Burke, N., Michaels, L., & Muhr, J. (2021). Psychotherapy Action Network: seeing beyond the crossroads. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 41(8), 558-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2021.1983392
Cantwell, S., Rae, J. P., Hayes, J., Vos, J., & Cooper, M. (2022). Therapists’ questions to clients about what might be helpful can be supportive without being directive: a conversation analysis. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 35(4), 921-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2021.1997917
Carlson, M. A., Fradgley, E. A., Bridge, P., Taylor, J., Morris, S., Coutts, E., & Paul, C. (2022). The dynamic relationship between cancer and employment-related financial toxicity: An in-depth qualitative study of 21 Australian cancer survivor experiences and preferences for support. Supportive Care in Cancer, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06707-7
Chen, M., Lindley, A., Kimport, K., & Dehlendorf, C. (2019). An in-depth analysis of the use of shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception, 99(3), 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.009
Christensen, K. (2022). Yarning as decolonising practice. International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, (1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4320/RXKW8245
Comas-Díaz, L. (2022). Decolonization: a personal manifesto. Women & Therapy, 45(4), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2022.2125617
Connolly, W. E. (2005). Pluralism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822387084
Cooper, M. and Norcross, J.C. (2016). A brief, multidimensional measure of clients’ therapy preferences: the Cooper-Norcross Inventory of Preferences (C-NIP). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.08.003
Cooper, M., Di Malta, G., Knox, S., Oddli, H. W., & Swift, J. K. (2023). Patient perspectives on working with preferences in psychotherapy: A consensual qualitative research study. Psychotherapy Research, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2161967
Cooper, M., Wild, C., van Rijn, B., Ward, T., McLeod, J., Cassar, S., and Sreenath, S. (2015). Pluralistic therapy for depression: Acceptability, outcomes and helpful aspects in a multisite study. Counselling Psychology Review, 30(1), 6-20.
Costa, L., Voronka, J., Landry, D., Reid, J., Mcfarlane, B., Reville, D., & Church, K. (2012). “Recovering our stories”: A small act of resistance. Studies in Social Justice, 6(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1070
Crawford, J., Petrie, K., & Harvey, S. B. (2021). Shared decision-making and the implementation of treatment recommendations for depression. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(8), 2119-2121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.025
Dahlqvist Jönsson P, Schön UK, Rosenberg D, Sandlund M, Svedberg P. (2015) Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services. Journal of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing. 22(9) 688-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12246
Danchev, A. (Ed.). (2011). 100 artists' manifestos: from the Futurists to the Stuckists. Penguin.
Dawson, L., Hay, J. & Rosling, N. (2021). Therapeutic creativity and the lived experience of grief in the collaborative fiction film Lost Property. Research for All, 5(2), 227–45. https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.05.2.04
Day‐Vines, N. L., Wood, S. M., Grothaus, T., Craigen, L., Holman, A., Dotson‐Blake, K., & Douglass, M. J. (2007). Broaching the subjects of race, ethnicity, and culture during the counseling process. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85(4), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007. tb00608.x
de Freitas Araujo, S., & Osbeck, L. M. (2023). Ever Not Quite: Pluralism (s) in William James and Contemporary Psychology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954327
Di Malta, G., Oddli, H. W. and Cooper, M. (2019) From intention to action: a mixed methods study of clients’ experiences of goal-oriented practices. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(10), 1770–1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22821
Durand, M. A., Carpenter, L., Dolan, H., Bravo, P., Mann, M., Bunn, F., & Elwyn, G. (2014). Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One, 9(4), e94670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094670
Dutta, U., Azad, A. K., & Hussain, S. M. (2022). Counterstorytelling as epistemic justice: Decolonial community‐based praxis from the global south. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(1-2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12545
Ejbye-Ernst, D., & Jorring, N. T. (2017). Doing it collaboratively! Addressing the dilemmas of designing quantitative effect studies on narrative family therapy in a local clinical context. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 36(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2017.36.1.48
Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430
Elwyn, G., Durand, M. A., Song, J., Aarts, J., Barr, P. J., Berger, Z., ... & Van der Weijden, T. (2017). A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. British Medical Journal, 359. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4891
Escobar, A. (2016). Thinking- feeling with the Earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e
Etherington, K. (2017). Personal experience and critical reflexivity in counselling and psychotherapy research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12080
Etherington, K. (2020). Becoming a narrative inquirer. In S. Bager-Charleson & A. McBeath (Eds). Enjoying research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods research. (pp. 71-93). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55127-8_5
Eubanks CF, Muran JC, & Safran JD. (2018) Alliance rupture repair: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy 55(4) pp 508-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000185
Faulkner, A. (2017). Survivor research and Mad Studies: the role and value of experiential knowledge in mental health research. Disability & Society, 32(4), 500-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1302320
Fine, M. (2013). Echoes of Bedford: A 20-year social psychology memoir on participatory action research hatched behind bars. American Psychologist, 68(8), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034359
Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2019). Critical participatory action research: A feminist project for validity and solidarity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319865255
Fitzpatrick, O. M., Holcomb, J. M., Weisz, J. R., & Langer, D. A. (2023). Shared decision-making as a tool for navigating multi-stakeholder discrepancies in youth psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 52(1), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2127105
Fox, J. (2021). Shared decision-making: an autoethnography about service user perspectives in making choices about mental health care and treatment. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 637560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.637560
Fried, E. I. (2021). Studying mental health problems as systems, not syndromes. Current Directions in Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 31(6), 500-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221114089
Fried, E. I., & Robinaugh, D. J. (2020). Systems all the way down: embracing complexity in mental health research. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01668-w
Funtowicz, S. O., Ravetz, J. R. (2003). Post-normal science. International Society for Ecological Economics; Online Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845258430-99
Fyson, R., Morley, K., & Murphy, A. (2019). Using the Power Threat Meaning Framework in social work education. Clinical Psychology Forum, 313, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2019.1.313.33
Gandhi, R. S. (2021). Being brown: An autoethnographic exploration of internalised colonisation. Psychodynamic Practice, 27(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2021.1893211
Gibson, A., Cooper, M., Rae, J., & Hayes, J. (2020). Clients' experiences of shared decision making in an integrative psychotherapy for depression. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(2), 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13320
Granek, L. & Nakash, O. (2016). The impact of qualitative research on the “real world” knowledge translation as education, policy, clinical training, and clinical practice. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(4), 414-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167815574623
Gregory, M. R., & Laverty, M. J. (Eds.). (2018). In community of inquiry with Ann Margaret Sharp: Childhood, philosophy and education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625393
Griffiths, A. (2019). Reflections on using the Power Threat Meaning Framework in peer-led systems. Clinical Psychology Forum, 313, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2019.1.313.9
Groot, B. C., Schrijver, J., & Abma, T. A. (2021). Are you afraid of press and social media? Ethics in photovoice in participatory health research. Educational Action Research, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1941164
Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3-4), 244-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729473
Hessinger, J. D., London, M. J., & Baer, S. M. (2018). Evaluation of a shared decision-making intervention on the utilization of evidence-based psychotherapy in a VA outpatient PTSD clinic. Psychological Services, 15(4), 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000141
Hoggett, P., Lousada, J., Maguire, M., & Ryan, J. (2022). Battersea Action and Counselling Centre (BACC). Psychoanalysis and History, 24(3), 291-298. https://doi.org/10.3366/pah.2022.0435
Hoshmand, L.T., & Martin, J. (eds) (1994). Method choice and inquiry process: Lessons from programmatic research in therapeutic psychology. Teachers Press.
Huet, V., Springham, N., & Evans, C. (2014). The Art Therapy Practice Research Network: Hurdles, pitfalls and achievements. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 14(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2014.929416
James, W. (1909). A pluralistic universe. Harvard University Press.
Johnson, R. B. (2017). Dialectical pluralism: A metaparadigm whose time has come. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 156-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607692
Johnstone, L., & Boyle, M. (2018a). The power threat meaning framework: Towards the identification of patterns in emotional distress, unusual experiences and troubled or troubling behaviour, as an Alternative to Functional Psychiatric Diagnosis. British Psychological Society. https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-07/PTM%20Framework%20%28January% 202018%29_0.pdf
Johnstone, L., & Boyle, M. (2018b). The power threat meaning framework: Overview. British Psychological Society. https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-10/PTMF%20overview.pdf
Joyce, P., Cooper, M., McLeod, J., & Vos, J. (2023). Pluralistic counselling versus counselling as usual for young people presenting with addiction issues: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12514
Kaslow, N. J., Farber, E. W., Ammons, C. J., Graves, C. C., Hampton-Anderson, J. N., Lewis, D. E., Lim, N., McKenna, B. G., Penna, S., & Cattie, J. E. (2022). Capability-informed competency approach to lifelong professional development. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 16(2), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000392
Kim, C., Berta, W. B., & Gagliardi, A. R. (2021). Exploring approaches to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in clinical guidelines: qualitative interviews with guideline developers. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(4), 703-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.001
Kønig, N., Børsen, T., & Emmeche, C. (2017). The ethos of post-normal science. Futures, 91, 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.12.004
Kreienkamp, J. and Pegram, T. (2021) Governing complexity: Design principles for the governance of complex global catastrophic risks, International Studies Review, Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa074
Land, V., Parry, R., & Seymour, J. (2017). Communication practices that encourage and constrain shared decision making in health‐care encounters: Systematic review of conversation analytic research. Health Expectations, 20(6), 1228-1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12557
Langer, D. A., Holly, L. E., Wills, C. E., Tompson, M. C., & Chorpita, B. F. (2022). Shared decision-making for youth psychotherapy: A preliminary randomized clinical trial on facilitating personalized treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 90(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000702
Lea, L., Byford, S., Coney, Y., Crane, R., Fagabemi, N., Gurney, T., Leigh-Phippard, H., Rosten, C., Simms, K., & Strauss, C. (2020). Reflections on my role as a mental health service user co-applicant in a randomized control trial. Research for All, 4(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.04.1.04
Leichsenring, F., Abbass, A., Hilsenroth, M. J., Luyten, P., Munder, T., Rabung, S., & Steinert, C. (2018). “Gold standards,” plurality and monocultures: The need for diversity in psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00159
Lieblich, A. (2006). Vicissitudes: A study, a book, a play: Lessons from the work of a narrative scholar. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405282795
Long, C., Matee, H., Jwili, O., & Vilakazi, Z. (2020). Racial difference, rupture, and repair: A view from the couch and back. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 30(6), 698-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2020.1829432
McLeod, John (2018) Pluralistic therapy: distinctive features. London: Routledge.
McLeod, Julia (2013) Process and outcome in pluralistic Transactional Analysis counselling for long-term health conditions: a case series. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13(1) 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.709873
McLeod, Julia, Lumsdaine, S., & Smith, K. (2021). Equipping students to be resourceful practitioners in community settings: A realist analysis. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 23(4), 496-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2021.2000464
Menichetti, J., Henselmans, I., Noordman, J., Landmark, A. M., Gerwing, J., Hillen, M., & Pieterse, A. (2021). Methods for analyzing actual communication: A shared decision making consultation under multiple methodological lenses. Patient Education and Counseling, 104, 2598–2600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.003
Miller, T. R., T. D. Baird, C. M. Littlefield, G. Kofinas, F. Chapin, III, and C. L. Redman. (2008). Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecology and Society, 13(2): 46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02671-130246
Mills, D. (2023). Applying a neurodiversity affirmative approach to the pluralistic framework. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12637
Morrow, S.L. (2009). A journey into survival and coping by women survivors of childhood sexual abuse. In L. Finlay, L. and K. Evans (eds) Relational-centred research for psychotherapists: exploring meanings and experiences. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Morrow, S.L. and Smith, M.L. (1995) Constructions of survival and coping by women who have survived childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.1.24
Nehrig, N., Prout, T. A., & Aafjes‐van Doorn, K. (2019). Whose anxiety are we treating, anyway? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(10), 1866-1878. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22824
Nosek, B.A. & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific Utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217-243. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.1205.1055
Novis-Deutsch, N. (2020). Pluralism as an antidote to epistemic violence in psychological research. Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 408-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320928116
Novis-Deutsch, N. S. (2018). The one and the many: Both/and reasoning and the embracement of pluralism. Theory & Psychology, 28(4), 429-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318758935
Novis‐Deutsch, N. (2015). Identity conflicts and value pluralism—what can we learn from religious psychoanalytic therapists? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(4), 484-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12079
O’Reilly, M. (2020, June 5). Systems centered language: Speaking truth to power during COVID-19 while confronting racism. Medium. https://medium.com/@meagoreillyphd/systems-centered-language-a3dc7951570e
Oddli, H. W., Stänicke, E., Halvorsen, M. S., & Lindstad, T. G. (2022). Causality in psychotherapy research: Towards evidential pluralism. Psychotherapy Research, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2161433
Penkala-Gawęcka, D., & Rajtar, M. (2016). Introduction to the special issue ‘medical pluralism and beyond’. Anthropology & Medicine, 23(2), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2016.1180584
Phelan, S. E. (2001). What Is Complexity Science, Really? Emergence (Mahwah, N.J.), 3(1), 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327000EM0301_08
Ponton, R. F. (2014). Sharing knowledge, building knowledge: The journal as a community of practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 36(4), 283-287. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.36.4.p584vv4l74118137
Råbu, M., McLeod, J., Haavind, H., Bernhardt, I. S., Nissen-Lie, H., & Moltu, C. (2021). How psychotherapists make use of their experiences from being a client: Lessons from a collective autoethnography. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34(1), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2019.1671319
Raina, P. (2022). Transforming the landscape of identity for people with social anxiety. International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, (2), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.4320/TBLT2389
Ramon, S., Morant, N., Stead, U., & Perry, B. (2017). Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: a mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 63(8), 763-772. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-01-2017-0006
Resnicow, K., Catley, D., Goggin, K., Hawley, S., & Williams, G. C. (2022). Shared decision making in health care: theoretical perspectives for why it works and for whom. Medical Decision Making, 42(6), 755-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211058068
Robert, G. (2022). Co-producing and co-designing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009237024
Rodriguez Espinosa, P.R., & Verney, S. P. (2021). The underutilization of community‐based participatory research in psychology: A systematic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 67(3-4), 312-326. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ajcp.12469
Rose, D. (2020). On personal epiphanies and collective knowledge in survivor research and action. Social Theory & Health, 18(2), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-019-00087-z
Roy, N. (2022). The use of indigenous research methodologies in counselling: responsibility, respect, relationality, and reciprocity. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 17(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.7202/1097719ar
Saad, M., De Medeiros, R., & Mosini, A. C. (2017). Are we ready for a true biopsychosocial–spiritual model? The many meanings of “spiritual”. Medicines, 4(4),79. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4040079
Salzburg Global Seminar (2011). Salzburg statement on shared decision making. British Medical Journal, 342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1745
Sarantakis, N. P. (2020). Rediscovering meaning when entering “older age”: A counseling case study based on a lifespan development and a pluralistic approach. Practice Innovations, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000102
Sharp, A.M. (1987). What is a ‘Community of Inquiry'? Journal of Moral Education, 16(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724870160104
Sharp, A.M. & Shea, P. (2018). Where I learned community of inquiry. In M.R. Gregory & M.J. Laverty (Eds.). In community of inquiry with Ann Margaret Sharp: Childhood, philosophy and education. (pp. 18-25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625393-2
Slife, B. D., & Gantt, E. E. (1999). Methodological pluralism: A framework for psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(12), 1453-1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1453::AID-JCLP4>3.0.CO;2-C
Smith, K., McLeod, J., Blunden, N., Cooper, M., Gabriel, L., Kupfer, C., ... & Winter, L. A. (2021). A pluralistic perspective on research in psychotherapy: Harnessing passion, difference and dialogue to promote justice and relevance. Frontiers in Psychology, 3728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg. 2021.742676
Speciale, M., Gess, J., & Speedlin, S. (2015). You don't look like a lesbian: A coautoethnography of intersectional identities in counselor education. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 9(4), 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2015.1103678
Spinnewijn, L., Aarts, J., Verschuur, S., Braat, D., Gerrits, T., & Scheele, F. (2020). Knowing what the patient wants: a hospital ethnography studying physician culture in shared decision making in the Netherlands. BMJ Open, 10(3), e032921. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032921
Stirling, F. J. (2020). Journeying to visibility: An autoethnography of self‐harm scars in the therapy room. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 18(2), e1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1537
Stoddart, S. (2022). Using social rather than personal framing to demystify abuse and achieve meaningful change. International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, (1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.429148926455180
Stone, R. (2006). Does pragmatism lead to pluralism? Exploring the disagreement between Jerome Bruner and William James regarding pragmatism’s goal. Theory & Psychology, 16(4), 553-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354306066206
Sweeney, A., White, S., Kelly, K., Faulkner, A., Papoulias, S., & Gillard, S. (2022). Survivor‐led guidelines for conducting trauma‐informed psychological therapy assessments: Development and modified Delphi study. Health Expectations, 25(6), 2818-2827. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13585
Tan, N. Q., Maki, K. G., Lopez-Olivo, M. A., Geng, Y., & Volk, R. J. (2022). Cultural influences on shared decision-making among Asian Americans: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Patient Education and Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.350
Thambinathan, V., & Kinsella, E. A. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
Thomas, K. A., Goodman, L. A., Vainer, E. S., Heimel, D., Barkai, R., & Collins-Gousby, D. (2018). “No sacred cows or bulls”: The story of the domestic violence program evaluation a and research collaborative (DVPERC). Journal of Family Violence, 33(8), 537-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9978-z
Thompson, A., Cooper, M., & Pauli, R. (2017). Development of a therapists’ self-report measure of pluralistic thought and practice: the Therapy Pluralism Inventory. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 45(5), 489-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1373745
Thompson, D. S., Fazio, X., Kustra, E., Patrick, L., & Stanley, D. (2016). Scoping review of complexity theory in health services research. BMC Health Services Research, 16(88), 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1343-4
Tracy, M., Ayre, J., Mac, O., Copp, T., Trevena, E. L., & Shepherd, H. (2022). Question prompt lists and endorsement of question‐asking support patients to get the information they seek—A longitudinal qualitative study. Health Expectations, 25(4), 1652-1663. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13509
Turner, J. & Baker, R. (2019). Complexity theory: An overview with potential applications for the social sciences. Systems, 7(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems7010004
Valentine, K. D., Vo, H., Fowler Jr, F. J., Brodney, S., Barry, M. J., & Sepucha, K. R. (2021). Development and evaluation of the shared decision making process scale: a short patient-reported measure. Medical Decision Making, 41(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20977878
van der Horst, D. E., Garvelink, M. M., Bos, W. J. W., Stiggelbout, A. M., & Pieterse, A. H. (2023). For which decisions is Shared Decision Making considered appropriate?—a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 106, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.015
Venturo-Conerly, K. E., Reynolds, R., Clark, M., Fitzpatrick, O. M., & Weisz, J. R. (2023). Personalizing youth psychotherapy: A scoping review of decision-making in modular treatments. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 30(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000130
Viney, W. (2022). William James’s Pluralism: An antidote for contemporary extremism and absolutism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003276715
Webb, K. B. (2011). Care of others and self: A suicidal patient's impact on the psychologist. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(3), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022752
Wendt, D. C., & Slife, B. D. (2009). Recent calls for Jamesian pluralism in the natural and social sciences: Will psychology heed the call? The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 185-204. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43854248
Williams, G.L. (2020). From anonymous subject to engaged stakeholder: Enriching participant experience in autistic-language-use research. Research for All, 4(2), 314–28. https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.04.2.13
Williford, D. N., McTate, E. A., Hood, A. M., Reader, S. K., Hildenbrand, A. K., Smith-Whitley, K., Creary, S. E., Thompson, A. A., Hackworth, R., Raphael, J. L., & Crosby, L. E. (2023). Psychologists as leaders in equitable science: Applications of antiracism and community participatory strategies in a pediatric behavioral medicine clinical trial. American Psychologist, 78(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001086
Zahid, N. (2023). What’s in a name? Why names matter for people of colour. In N. Zahid, & R. Cooke (Eds). Therapists challenging racism and oppression: The unheard voices. (pp. 11-29). PCCS Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pluralistic Practice Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
